Impact of Affordable Housing on Families and Communities

Housing affordable to those with a median household income

Affordable housing is housing which is deemed affordable to those with a household income at or below the median[1] every bit rated by the national government or a local government by a recognized housing affordability alphabetize. Most of the literature on affordable housing refers to mortgages and a number of forms that be along a continuum – from emergency homeless shelters, to transitional housing, to non-marketplace rental (also known as social or subsidized housing), to formal and informal rental, ethnic housing, and ending with affordable abode buying.[ii] [iii] [4] [5]

In Commonwealth of australia, the National Affordable Housing Pinnacle Group developed their definition of affordable housing as housing that is "...reasonably acceptable in standard and location for lower or heart income households and does non cost so much that a household is unlikely to exist able to meet other basic needs on a sustainable basis."[6] Affordable housing in the United kingdom includes "social rented and intermediate housing, provided to specified eligible households whose needs are not met past the market."[7]

Housing choice is a response to an extremely complex set of economic, social, and psychological impulses.[8] For example, some households may choose to spend more on housing because they feel they can afford to, while others may non have a choice.[9]

https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_inpractice_090814.html

Legends Park West Mixed-Income and Affordable Housing Redevelopment in Memphis Tennessee, United states of america

Definition and measurement [edit]

At that place are several means of defining and measuring affordable housing. The definition and measurement may change in different nations, cities, or for specific policy goals.[10] [xi] [12] [13] Several common ways of measuring and defining affordable housing are found below.

Median multiple approaches [edit]

The median multiple indicator, recommended by the World Bank and the Un, rates affordability of housing by dividing the median firm toll by gross (before taxation) almanac median household income).

A mutual measure of customs-wide affordability is the number of homes that a household with a certain percentage of median income can afford. For example, in a perfectly balanced housing market, the median household (the wealthier half of households) could officially beget the median housing option, while those poorer than the median income could non afford the median home. fifty% affordability for the median dwelling indicates a balanced market place.[one]

Some countries look at those living in relative poverty, which is usually defined as making less than lx% of the median household income. In their policy reports, they consider the presence or absenteeism of housing for people making 60% of the median income.

Housing costs as percentage of gross income [edit]

Determining housing affordability is complex and the commonly used housing-expenditure-to-income-ratio tool has been challenged. In the United states[14] and Canada,[15] a usually accepted guideline for housing affordability is a housing cost, including utilities, that does non exceed thirty% of a household'due south gross income.[sixteen] Some definitions include maintenance costs as part of housing costs.[17] Canada, for example, switched to a 25% rule from a 20% rule in the 1950s. In the 1980s this was replaced by a 30% rule.[8] India uses a 40% dominion.

Housing affordability index approaches [edit]

In that location are several types of housing affordability indexes that have a number of factors, not just income, into business relationship when measuring housing affordability.[18] [19]

The American National Clan of Realtors and other groups measure market housing through a housing affordability index which measures whether or not a typical family could qualify for a mortgage loan on a typical home. This alphabetize calculates affordability based on the national median-priced single family dwelling house, the typical family median income, and the prevailing mortgage involvement rate to determine if the median income family tin qualify for a mortgage on a typical home.[20] To interpret the indices, a value of 100 means that a family unit with the median income has exactly enough income to authorize for a mortgage on a median-priced home.[xx] An alphabetize over 100 signifies that family earning the median income has more than than enough income for a mortgage loan on the median-priced home (assuming they take a 20 percent down payment).[20] For example, a composite HAI of 120.0 means a family unit earning the median family income has 120% of the income necessary to authorize for a conventional loan covering 80 per centum of a median-priced existing single-family unit abode.[20] An increase in the HAI shows that this family unit is more able to afford the median-priced home.[20]

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) developed a housing affordability alphabetize that attempts to capture the total cost of housing by several factors include employment accessibility, amenities, transportation costs and transit access, quality of schools, etc. In computing the alphabetize the obvious cost of rents and mortgage payments are modified by the hidden costs of those choices.[21] Other groups have likewise created amenity based housing affordability indexes.[22]

The Centre for Neighborhood Technology developed the Housing + Transportation (H+T) Affordability Index provides a comprehensive view of affordability that includes both the toll of housing and the price of transportation at the neighborhood level.[23] CNT notes that the 30% of household income affordability measurementment results in footling over one-half (55%) of U.Due south. neighborhoods being considered "affordable" for the typical household.[23] They annotation that such a measurement fails to take into account transportation costs (such every bit multiple cars, gas, maintenance), which are unremarkably a household'due south second-largest expenditure.[23] When transportation costs are factored into the measurement, the number of affordable neighborhoods nationally drops to 26%, resulting in a net loss of 59,768 neighborhoods that Americans tin truly afford.[23] Per CNT'south measurement, people who live in location-efficient neighborhoods that are meaty, mixed-use, and take user-friendly access to jobs, services, transit and amenities tend to have lower transportation costs.[23] [24]

Household income and wealth approaches [edit]

Some analysts believe income is the chief factor – not toll and availability, that determines housing affordability.[25] In a market economy the distribution of income is the key determinant of the quantity and quality of housing obtained. Therefore, understanding affordable housing challenges requires agreement trends and disparities in income and wealth. Housing is ofttimes the single biggest expenditure of low and centre income families. For low and centre income families, their house is also the greatest source of wealth.[26]

Another method of studying affordability looks at the regular hourly wage of full-time workers who are paid only the minimum wage (as set up by their local, regional, or national government).[27] This methods attempts to determine if workers at that income can afford acceptable housing.

Differing parameters and limitations in approaches [edit]

Housing affordability can be measured by the irresolute relationships between house prices and rents, and between business firm prices and incomes.[28] Housing affordability may be measured past various expenditures beyond the toll of the actual housing stock itself, that are considered depending on the alphabetize being used.

Some organizations and agencies consider the cost of purchasing a unmarried-family domicile; others await exclusively at the cost of renting an apartment. Many U.S. studies, for example, focus primarily on the median cost of renting a ii-bedroom apartment in a big flat circuitous for a new tenant. These studies frequently lump together luxury apartments and slums, equally well as desirable and undesirable neighborhoods. While this exercise is known to distort the true costs, it is hard to provide accurate information for the wide variety of situations without the report being unwieldy.[ citation needed ]

Often, but legal, permitted, divide housing is considered when calculating the cost of housing. The depression rent costs for a room in a single family unit dwelling, or an illegal garage conversion, or a college dormitory are by and large excluded from the calculation, no matter how many people in an area alive in such situations. Because of this written report methodology, median housing costs tend to be slightly inflated.[ citation needed ]

Costs are more often than not considered on a cash (not accrual) footing. Thus a person making the final payment on a large habitation mortgage might alive in officially unaffordable housing one month, and very affordable housing the following month, when the mortgage is paid off. This baloney tin can be pregnant in areas where real estate costs are high, fifty-fifty if incomes are similarly high, because a high income allows a higher proportion of the income to be dedicated towards buying an expensive dwelling house without endangering the household'southward power to purchase food or other basic necessities.[ citation needed ]

Economics [edit]

Causes and consequences of rises in housing prices [edit]

Costs are being driven by a number of factors including:

  • demographic shifts
    • the declining number of people per dwelling
    • growing density convergence and regional urbanization
    • solid population growth (for example loftier prices in Australia and Canada as a rising population pushes up demand)[28]
  • supply and need
    • a shortfall in the number of dwellings to the number of households
      • smaller family size
      • potent psychological want for home ownership[29]
  • shifts in economic policies and innovations in financial instruments
    • reduced profitability of other forms of investment
    • availability of housing finance[30]
    • low involvement rates[30]
    • mortgage market innovations[thirty]
  • public policy
    • regulation
    • land use zoning
    • significant taxes, levies and fees by government on new housing (especially in Commonwealth of australia)

Supply and need [edit]

In some countries, the market has been unable to meet the growing demand to supply housing stock at affordable prices. Although demand for affordable housing, particularly rental housing that is affordable for low and middle income earners, has increased, the supply has not.[31] [32] [33] [34] Potential home buyers are forced to turn to the rental market, which is also under pressure level.[35] An inadequate supply of housing stock increases need on the private and social rented sector, and in worse case scenarios, homelessness.[36]

Factors that touch on supply and demand of housing stock [edit]

  • Demographic and behavioral factors
  • Migration (to cities and potential employment)
  • Increased life expectancy
  • Building codes[37]
  • A greater propensity for people to live alone
  • Young adults delaying forming their ain household (in avant-garde economies)
  • Exclusionary zoning

[edit]

  • Employment rates
    • Rising unemployment rates increase demand for market rentals, social housing and homelessness.
  • Real household incomes
    • Household incomes have non kept up with ascension housing prices
  • Affordability of rents and owner occupation
  • Interest rates
  • Availability of mortgages
  • Levels of confidence in the economy and housing market place
    • Low confidence decreases demand for possessor occupation.[36]

Labour market performance [edit]

In both big metropolitan areas and regional towns where housing prices are high, a lack of affordable housing places local firms at a competitive disadvantage. They are placed under wage pressures every bit they endeavour to decrease the income/housing price gap. Key workers have fewer housing choices if prices rise to non-affordable levels. Variations in affordability of housing betwixt areas may create labour market impediments.

Potential workers are discouraged from moving to employment in areas of less affordability. They are too discouraged from migrating to areas of high affordability as the depression business firm prices and rents bespeak low capital gain potential and poor employment prospects.[38]

Inequality and housing [edit]

A number of researchers fence that a shortage of affordable housing – at least in the U.s.a. – is acquired in part by income inequality.[39] [forty] [41] David Rodda noted that from 1984 and 1991, the number of quality rental units decreased as the need for higher quality housing increased.[39] : 148 Through gentrification of older neighbourhoods, for example, in East New York, rental prices increased chop-chop as landlords found new residents willing to pay higher market rate for housing and left lower income families without rental units. The advert valorem property tax policy combined with rise prices made it difficult or impossible for low income residents to keep pace.[42]

Lack of affordable housing places a detail burden on local economies. Equally well, private consumers are faced with mortgage arrears and excessive debt and therefore cutting dorsum on consumption. A combination of high housing costs and high debt levels contributes to a reduction in savings. These factors tin pb to decreased investment in sectors that are essential to the long-term growth of the economic system.[ citation needed ]

Affordable housing and urbanization [edit]

The majority of the more than vii billion people on world at present live in cities (United nations). At that place are more than than 500 metropolis regions of more one million inhabitants in the globe. Cities become megacities become megalopolitan city regions and even "galaxies" of more than 60 million inhabitants. The Yangtze Delta-Greater Shanghai region now surpasses lxxx 1000000. Tokyo-Yokohama next to Osaka-Kobe-Kyoto have a combined population of 100 million. Rapid population growth leads to increased need for affordable housing in most cities. The availability of affordable housing in proximity of mass transit and linked to task distribution has get severely imbalanced in this menstruum of rapid regional urbanization and growing density convergence.

"In addition to the distress it causes families who cannot find a place to live, lack of affordable housing is considered by many urban planners to have negative effects on a community's overall health."[43]

Affordable housing challenges in inner cities range from the homeless who are forced to alive on the street to the relative deprivation of vital workers similar police officers, firefighters, teachers and nurses unable to discover affordable accommodation near their place of work. These workers are forced to live in bourgeoisie, commuting up to two hours each manner to piece of work.[44] Lack of affordable housing tin can brand low-cost labour scarcer (equally workers travel longer distances) (Pollard and Stanley 2007).[43]

Social and environmental impacts [edit]

Housing affordability is more than than only a personal trouble experienced past individual households who cannot hands find a place to alive.[45] Lack of affordable housing is considered by many urban planners to accept negative furnishings on a community's overall wellness.[46]

Jobs, transportation, and affordable housing [edit]

Lack of affordable housing tin can make low-cost labor more than scarce, and increment demands on transportation systems (every bit workers travel longer distances between jobs and affordable housing). Housing price increases in U.S. cities[47] have been linked to declines in enrollment at local schools.[48] "Faced with few affordable options, many people attempt to find less expensive housing past buying or renting farther out, only long commutes oftentimes consequence in college transportation costs that erase any savings on shelter." Pollard (2010) chosen this the "bulldoze 'til yous authorize" arroyo, which causes far-flung development and forces people to drive longer distances to get to work, to become groceries, to have children to school, or to appoint in other activities.[49] A well located dwelling might save significant household travel costs and therefore better overall family economics, fifty-fifty if the rent is higher than a dwelling in a poorer location.[6]

A household'south inhabitants must decide whether to pay more than for housing to keep commuting fourth dimension and expense low, or to take a long or expensive commute to obtain "better" housing. The absolute availability of housing is non by and large considered in the adding of affordable housing. In a depressed or sparsely settled rural area, for example, the predicted cost of the canonical median two-bedroom flat may be quite easily affordable fifty-fifty to a minimum-wage worker – if but whatsoever apartments had ever been congenital. Some affordable housing prototypes include Nano House and Affordable Green Tiny House Project.[ citation needed ]

Improving thermal comfort at domicile especially for houses without acceptable warmth and for tenants with chronic respiratory disease may lead to improved wellness and promote social relationships.[fifty]

Affordable housing and public policy [edit]

Background [edit]

Policy makers at all levels – global, national, regional, municipal, community associations – are attempting to answer to the issue of affordable housing, a highly complex crunch of global proportions, with a myriad of policy instruments.[45] These responses range from stop-gap financing tools to long-term intergovernmental[51] infrastructural changes. There has been an increase among policy makers in affordable housing every bit the toll of housing has increased dramatically creating a crisis in affordable housing.[36]

In the simplest of terms, affordability of housing refers to the amount of capital one has available in relation to the price of the appurtenances to be obtained. Public policies are informed by underlying assumptions about the nature of housing itself. Is housing a basic need, a right,[52] [53] an entitlement, or a public good? Or is just another household-level consumer choice, a commodity or an investment within the free market system? "Housing Policies provide a remarkable litmus test for the values of politicians at every level of office and of the varied communities that influence them. Often this test measures simply the warmth or coldness of middle of the more flush and secure towards families of a lower socio-economic status."[54]

The growing gap between rich and poor since the 1980s manifests itself in a housing arrangement where public policy decisions privilege the ownership sector to the disadvantage of the rental sector.[51] The notion of housing affordability became widespread in the 1980s in Europe and North America. In the words of Alain Bertaud, of New York University and former principal planner at the World Bank,

Information technology is time for planners to abandon abstract objectives and to focus their efforts on two measurable outcomes that have always mattered since the growth of large cities during the 19th century's industrial revolution: workers' spatial mobility and housing affordability.[55]

Ann Owen wonders if the housing marketplace helped reduced poverty concentration in the National longitudinal data between the years of 1977–2008 with the concentration of the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the United States. Data information is to compare or intertwine with the differences of national housing subsidies, the entry, exit, and enhancement of low-income housing.[56]

Affordable housing is a controversial reality of contemporary life, for gains in affordability oftentimes consequence from expanding land bachelor for housing or increasing the density of housing units in a given area.[ commendation needed ] Ensuring a steady supply of affordable housing means ensuring that communities weigh existent and perceived livability impacts against the sheer necessity of affordability. The procedure of weighing the impacts of locating affordable housing is quite contentious and is laden with race and class implications. Recent research, yet, suggests that proximity to low-income housing developments generally has a positive touch on on neighborhood property atmospheric condition.[57]

To combat slums, homelessness, and other social and economic impacts of a housing unaffordability, many groups have argued for a "right to housing". Article 25 of the Universal Annunciation of Homo Rights recognizes the right to housing as office of the correct to an adequate standard of living.[58] Article 11(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) also guarantees the right to housing as role of the correct to an acceptable standard of living.[58] Many housing rights groups likewise endeavor to combat social and political problems which relate to admission to quality affordable housing such as housing discrimination, redlining, and lack of access to amenities in areas with affordable housing including food deserts and transit deserts.[59] [threescore] [61] [62] [63] [64]

Market place-based approaches [edit]

Affordable housing needs tin can be addressed through public policy instruments that focus on the demand side of the market, programs that assistance households reach financial benchmarks that make housing affordable. This can include approaches that but promote economic growth in general – in the hope that a stronger economy, college employment rates, and higher wages will increase the power of households to acquire housing at market prices. Federal government policies define banking and mortgage lending practices, tax and regulatory measures affecting building materials, professional person practices (ex. real estate transactions).[51] The purchasing power of individual households can exist enhanced through tax and fiscal policies that result in reducing the cost of mortgages and the price of borrowing. Public policies may include the implementation of subsidy programs and incentive patterns for boilerplate households.[51] For the most vulnerable groups, such as seniors, single-parent families, the disabled, etc. some form of publicly funded assart strategy can be implemented providing individual households with adequate income to afford housing.

Currently, policies that facilitate production on the supply side include favorable country use policies such as inclusionary zoning, relaxation of environmental regulations, and the enforcement of affordable housing quotas in new developments.[ citation needed ]

In some countries, such equally Canada and the Us, municipal governments began to play a greater role in developing and implementing policies regarding form and density of municipal housing in residential districts, as early on as the 1950s.[51] At the municipal level, promoted policy tools include zoning permissions for diverse housing types or missing eye housing types such as duplexes, cottages, rowhomes, fourplexes, and accessory dwelling units.[65] [66] [67] [68] Some municipalities have also reduced the of the amount of parking that must be built for a new structure in order to reduce land acquisition and construction costs.[69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] Other mutual strategies include reducing permitting costs and look times for new housing, permitting minor-lot development, multi-family tax exemptions, density bonuses, preserving existing affordable housing, and transit-oriented development.[76] [77] [78] [79]

Existing housing that is affordable may be used, instead of edifice new structures. This is called "Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing", or NOAH.[80]

In a housing cooperative people join on a democratic basis to ain or manage the housing facility in which they live. Generally these housing units are endemic and controlled collectively past a corporation which is owned and controlled jointly by a group of individuals who have equal shares in that corporation.[81] [82] In market rate cooperatives owners can accumulate disinterestedness and sell their share of the corporation at market rate. In a limited-equity housing cooperative there are restrictions on the profits members can earn from selling their share (such as caps on sale price) to meant to maintain affordable housing.[81]

Customs land trusts are nonprofit corporation that holds state, housing, or other assets on behalf of a neighborhood or community. A customs state trust acquires and maintains buying of the land through a not-for-profit that holds the land in a trust.[83] [84] Homeowners and so purchase or build a home on land trust property only do not purchase the land thus reducing costs. If the homeowner sells, they may exist limited on what they may sell the home for or the family unit may earn only a portion of the increased belongings value with the remainder kept by the trust to preserve affordable housing[84] [85] There are over 225 community land trusts in the United States.[86]

Correct to build [edit]

An commodity past libertarian writer Virginia Postrel in the November 2007 issue of Atlantic Monthly reported on a study of the cost of obtaining the "right to build" (i.eastward. a edifice permit, cerise tape, bureaucracy, etc.) in different U.S. cities. The "right to build" cost does not include the cost of the land or the price of amalgam the house. The study was conducted past Harvard economists Edward Glaeser and Kristina Tobio. According to the nautical chart accompanying the article, the cost of obtaining the "right to build" adds approximately $600,000 to the cost of each new firm that is built in San Francisco. The written report, cited, published past Ed Glaeser and Joseph Gyourko, reached its decision most the value of the right to build in unlike localities based on a methodology of comparing the price of single-family homes on quarter-acre versus half-acre lots to get a marginal land cost so comparing the selling price of homes to structure costs to get a price for the land plus other costs, with the divergence between the two being attributed to the cost of zoning and other local regime permitting and regulations.[87]

Government restrictions on affordable housing [edit]

Many governments put restrictions on the size or cost of a dwelling that people tin can live in,[ citation needed ] making it essentially illegal to alive permanently in a house that is likewise small, low-cost or non compliant with other regime-defined requirements. By and large, these laws are implemented in an attempt to enhance the perceived "standard" of housing across the country. This can atomic number 82 to thousands of houses across a state being left empty for much of the year fifty-fifty when in that location is a smashing need for more affordable housing; such is the case in countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark, where in that location is a common tradition to have a summertime business firm. This sometimes raises concerns for the respect of rights such as the correct to utilise one'southward property.

Every bit of 2013[update], in the United states of america, most cities accept zoning codes that set the minimum size for a housing unit (often 400 foursquare feet) too equally the number of non-related persons who can live together in i unit, resulting in having "outlawed the lesser end of the private housing market, driving up rents on everything higher up information technology."[88]

In California in 2021, researchers estimated that parking requirements increase the cost of edifice affordable housing past upwardly to $36,000 per unit of measurement, and up to $75,000 per unit in cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco.[89]

Until 2018, in Los Angeles, for an affordable housing evolution to exist immune to be congenital, information technology required a "alphabetic character of acknowledgement" from the metropolis councilperson in whose commune information technology would be constructed. This immune city quango members to cake affordable housing developments in their district without having to give any reason.[90] [91]

Subsidy-based approaches [edit]

Subsidized housing is government or non-for-profit sponsored economic assistance aimed towards alleviating housing costs and expenses, generally for people with low to moderate incomes. Subsidy-based approaches may take the form of regime sponsored rental subsidies, authorities sponsored rental supplements, revenue enhancement credits, or housing provided past a not-for-turn a profit.[92] [93]

In a common-aid housing cooperative, a grouping of families forms a cooperative to collectively build, own, and manage land by participating in the process of amalgam the housing for the cooperative.[94] [95] Each family unit is responsible for contributing labor towards the construction of the housing complex to reduce costs and members take on responsibilities before, during, and afterward the construction. The Uruguayan Federation of Mutual Aid Housing Cooperatives (FUCVAM) has completed nearly 500 housing cooperatives housing more than 25,000 families.[96] [97]

The George-Washington-Hof is protected public housing in Vienna

[edit]

Public housing is a form of housing tenure in which the property is normally built and owned by a authorities authority, either central or local. In some countries, public housing is focused on providing affordable housing for depression-income earners while in others, such as Singapore, citizens across a wide range of incomes live in public housing.[98] [99] In Vienna, Austria, social housing may be completely government built and run or include a mixture of public country and individual-sector structure and management.[100] [101] Combined, the two types of housing represent almost 46 percent of the metropolis's housing stock (26% government owned and managed and 20% a public/private partnership) and house people with a wide variety of incomes.[100] [101] In South korea the public Korea Land & Housing Corporation has provided homes to two.9 one thousand thousand households which is 15% of the national total of 19.56 million households. This includes ii.7 million newly-built public housing units and 1.03 million rental homes of which 260,000 were purchased or rented by the Land and Housing Corporation.[102] [103]

Affordable housing by state [edit]

The challenges of promoting affordable housing varies by location.

See as well [edit]

  • Public housing
  • Subsidized housing
  • Subsidized housing in the United States
  • Section 8
  • Sídlisko
  • Panelák
  • Housing estate
  • Alternative housing
  • Embankment hut
  • Cottage
  • Friggebod
  • Housing gap
  • Illegal housing
  • Informal housing
  • Mobile dwelling
  • Modular building
  • Not-profit housing
  • Recreational vehicles
  • Shipping container architecture
  • Single-room occupancy
  • Tiny house motion

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b Bhatta, Basudeb (xv April 2010). Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Information. Advances in Geographic Computer science. Springer. p. 23. ISBN978-3-642-05298-9.
  2. ^ "Definition Affordable Housing" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 January 2020. Retrieved 12 Dec 2011.
  3. ^ CNHED Archived 4 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ^ "Queensland Affordable Housing Consortium [QAHC], Australia" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 April 2012.
  5. ^ Affordable Housing: Issues, Principles and Policy Options (PDF). Affordable Housing Summit. Canberra, Australia: Australian Council of Trade Unions. July 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 8 Dec 2011.
  6. ^ a b "Definition: Affordable Housing" Archived 26 Apr 2012 at the Wayback Auto, Queensland Affordable Housing Consortium, Commonwealth of australia
  7. ^ "Skillful practice and guidance, Reports and summaries". 29 November 2009. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
  8. ^ a b Hulchanski, J. David (October 1995). "The Concept of Housing Affordability: Half-dozen Gimmicky Uses of the Expenditure to Income Ratio" (PDF). Housing Studies. ten (4). doi:ten.1080/02673039508720833. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
  9. ^ Luffman, Jacqueline (Nov 2006). "Measuring housing affordability". seven (eleven). Statistics Canada.
  10. ^ "WHO | Practical measurement of affordability: an application to medicines". WHO. Archived from the original on 29 Jan 2015. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  11. ^ "Housing weather condition - OECD". www.oecd.org . Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  12. ^ "Is In that location a Amend Way to Measure Housing Affordability? | Joint Center for Housing Studies". www.jchs.harvard.edu . Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  13. ^ "Defining Housing Affordability | HUD USER". www.huduser.gov . Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  14. ^ Washington State Labor Quango (AFL-CIO) (2009). "Affordable Housing and Homelessness". Archived from the original on 8 February 2012. Retrieved viii December 2011.
  15. ^ Canada Mortgage; Housing Corporation (28 September 2011). "Affordable Housing: What is the mutual definition of affordability?". Government of Canada. Archived from the original (.cfm) on vii May 2007. Retrieved eight December 2011.
  16. ^ Christine C. Cook; Marilyn J. Bruin; Becky L. Yust (2018). "Chapter ten. Housing Affordability". In Carswell, Andrew T.; Anacker, Katrin B.; Tremblay, Kenneth R.; Kirby, Sarah D. (eds.). Introduction to Housing (2nd ed.). Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Printing. p. 171. ISBN9780820349688 . Retrieved 26 August 2021.
  17. ^ Wheeler, Stephen Thousand.; Rosan, Christina D. (2021). Reimagining Sustainable Cities: Strategies for Designing Greener, Healthier, More Equitable Communities. Oakland, California: Academy of California Press. p. 83. ISBN9780520381216 . Retrieved 26 August 2021.
  18. ^ Econsult Corporation and Penn Institute for Urban Enquiry (February 2012). "REVIEW OF THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD Engineering science'Due south HOUSING AND TRANSPORTATION AFFORDABILITY Alphabetize" (PDF). HUD.GOV.
  19. ^ Urban Plant. "Housing Affordability Local and National Perspectives" (PDF). Urban Plant.
  20. ^ a b c d eastward "Methodology". world wide web.nar.realtor . Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  21. ^ Measuring Housing Affordability (.html). The HAI Affordable Housing Index (Study). MIT Center for Real Estate. Retrieved 13 Dec 2011.
  22. ^ Fisher, Lynn M.; Pollakowski, Henry O.; Zabel, Jeffrey (Dec 2009). "Amenity-Based Housing Affordability Indexes". Existent Estate Economics. 37 (4): 705–746. doi:ten.1111/j.1540-6229.2009.00261.10. S2CID 155007018.
  23. ^ a b c d e "Housing + Transportation Affordability Index". Center for Neighborhood Technology. 1 January 2009. Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  24. ^ Center for Transit-Oriented Development and Center for Neighborhood Technology. "The Affordability Alphabetize: A New Tool for Measuring the True Affordability of a Housing Choice" (PDF). ReconnectingAmerica.org.
  25. ^ Tilly, Chris (2 November 2005). "ten" (PDF). The Economic Surround of Housing: Income Inequality and Insecurity. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 April 2012. Retrieved 16 December 2011.
  26. ^ Tilly, Chris (2 November 2005). "x" (PDF). The Economic Surround of Housing: Income Inequality and Insecurity. Lowell, Massachusetts: Center for Industrial Competitiveness, University of Massachusetts. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 April 2012. Retrieved 16 Dec 2011.
  27. ^ Adamczyk, Alicia (14 July 2020). "Minimum wage workers cannot afford rent in any U.S. state". CNBC . Retrieved 28 March 2021.
  28. ^ a b "Business firm of horrors, part 2: The bursting of the global housing bubble is just halfway through". The Economist. 26 Nov 2011. Retrieved 15 December 2011.
  29. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). www.rideforhome.com.au. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 13 January 2022. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived re-create equally championship (link)
  30. ^ a b c André, C. (28 January 2010). A Bird's Heart View of OECD Housing Markets (PDF) (Report). OECD Economics Department Working Papers. [ expressionless link ]
  31. ^ "Affordable housing". Authorities of Australia. Archived from the original on 28 March 2012.
  32. ^ "Housing supply and need – UK Parliament". Parliament.uk. 6 May 2010. Retrieved fifteen August 2012.
  33. ^ "Housing and Urban Policy". .rgu.ac.britain. Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. Retrieved fifteen Baronial 2012.
  34. ^ Mostafa, Anirban; Wong, Francis M. W.; Hui, Chi Mun Eddie (2006). "Relationship between Housing Affordability and Economical Development in Mainland People's republic of china – Instance of Shanghai". Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 132 (62): 9. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2006)132:1(62).
  35. ^ Judith Yates; Maryann Wulff (1999). "Housing Markets and Household Income Polarisation: A Metropolitan and Regional Assay" (PDF) . Retrieved eight Dec 2011.
  36. ^ a b c Schmuecker, Katie (March 2011). The good, the bad and the ugly: Housing demand 2025 (PDF) (Study). Challenging ideas – Irresolute policy. Establish for Public Policy Inquiry. Retrieved 16 December 2011. [ permanent dead link ]
  37. ^ Listokin, David; Hattis, David B., "Building Codes and Housing", Cityscape: A Periodical of Policy Evolution and Research, Volume eight, Number 1, 2005, U.S. Section of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research
  38. ^ Gabriel, Michelle; Jacobs, Keith; Arthurson, Kathy; Burke, Terry; Yates, Judith (May 2005). Conceptualising and measuring the housing affordability trouble (PDF) (Study). National Research Venture 3: Housing Affordability for Lower Income Australians. Australian Housing and Urban Research Constitute. p. 3. ISBN1-920941-76-two.
  39. ^ a b Rodda, David T. (1994). Rich Man, Poor Renter: A Study of the Relationship Between the Income Distribution and Depression Price Rental Housing (Thesis). Harvard University. p. 148. OCLC 34635540.
  40. ^ Vigdor, Jacob (2002). "Does Gentrification Damage the Poor?". Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Diplomacy. 2002: 133–182. doi:x.1353/urb.2002.0012. S2CID 155028628.
  41. ^ Matlack, Janna L.; Vigdor, Jacob L. (2008). "Do Rising Tides Lift All Prices? Income Inequality and Housing Affordability" (PDF). Journal of Housing Economics. 17 (3): 212–224. doi:x.1016/j.jhe.2008.06.004.
  42. ^ Pushed Out: The Hidden Costs of Gentrification: Displacement and Homelessness (PDF) (Written report). Found for Children and Poverty. 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on six Baronial 2013.
  43. ^ a b Bhatta, Basudeb (15 April 2010). Assay of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data. Advances in Geographic Information science. Springer. p. 42. ISBN978-3-642-05298-9.
  44. ^ Span, Gary; Watson, Sophie (22 March 2011). The New Blackwell Companion to the Urban center. John Wiley & Sons.
  45. ^ a b The Housing of Practiced Intentions: The Naya Pakistan Housing Program. Housing & Community Development Police eJournal. Social Science Inquiry Network (SSRN). Accessed 31 January 2020.
  46. ^ Gabriel, Michelle; Jacobs, Keith; Arthurson, Kathy; Shush, Terry; Yates, Judith (May 2005). Conceptualising and measuring the housing affordability problem (PDF) (Report). National Research Venture 3: Housing Affordability for Lower Income Australians. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. p. 2. ISBN1-920941-76-2.
  47. ^ Cleeland, Nancy (11 June 2006). "There Goes the Enrollment". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved 6 January 2018.
  48. ^ "Deconstructing the Myths: Housing Evolution Versus Schoolhouse Costs" (PDF) . Retrieved 6 January 2018.
  49. ^ Pollard, Trip (2010). Jobs, Transportation, and Affordable Housing: Connecting Home and Work (PDF) (Report). Southern Environmental Constabulary Eye/Housing Virginia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 March 2012.
  50. ^ Thomson H, Thomas S, Sellstrom E, Petticrew M (28 Feb 2013). "Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes" (PDF). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (ii): CD008657. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008657.pub2. PMID 23450585.
  51. ^ a b c d e Hulchanski, David J. (June 2006). "10. What Factors Shape Canadian Housing Policy? The Intergovernmental Role in Canada's Housing Organization" (PDF). In Immature, Robert; Leuprecht, Christian (eds.). Canada: The State of the Federation 2004: Municipal-Federal-Provincial Relations in Canada. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations. McGill-Queen'south University Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 April 2012. Retrieved 15 December 2011.
  52. ^ UNESCAP; UN-HABITAT; OHCHR; COHRE; CODI (2004). Coming together Report Regional Dialogue on Housing Rights (PDF) (Study). Bangkok, Thailand. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2007. Retrieved fifteen December 2011.
  53. ^ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights OHCHR. "Universal Announcement of Man Rights (1948) Article 25.ane".
  54. ^ Bacher, John C. (1993). Keeping to the Marketplace: The Development of Canadian Housing Policy . Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. p. sixteen.
  55. ^ "10th Almanac Demographia International Housing Affordability Survey: 2014" (PDF) . Retrieved thirteen February 2016.
  56. ^ Owen, Ann (2015). "Housing Policy and Urban Inequality: Did the Transformation of Assisted Housing Reduce Poverty Concentration?". Housing Policy and Urban Inequality: 325.
  57. ^ Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Low-Income Housing Revenue enhancement Credit Developments and Neighborhood Property Conditions, Dec 2011
  58. ^ a b Edgar, Bill; Doherty, Joe; Meert, Henk (2002). Access to housing: homelessness and vulnerability in Europe. The Policy Press. p. 17. ISBN978-1-86134-482-3.
  59. ^ "How Stable, Affordable Housing Can Help Tackle Food Insecurity". Housing Matters. ii October 2019. Retrieved 4 April 2021.
  60. ^ "Housing and Nutrient Insecurity | HUD USER". www.huduser.gov . Retrieved iv April 2021.
  61. ^ "USDA ERS - Admission to Affordable, Nutritious Food Is Limited in "Nutrient Deserts"". world wide web.ers.usda.gov . Retrieved four April 2021.
  62. ^ Williams, Joseph P. (4 Apr 2018). "Stranded Without Transit: Millions of people lack acceptable access to transportation, and the consequences could be dire". The states News.
  63. ^ Name (four September 2017). "In the US, transit deserts are making it hard for people to detect jobs and stay salubrious". City Monitor . Retrieved 4 April 2021.
  64. ^ "Policy objective: Reducing housing bigotry". Local Housing Solutions . Retrieved 4 April 2021.
  65. ^ "The 'Missing' Affordable Housing Solution". AARP . Retrieved thirteen March 2021.
  66. ^ Wegmann, Jake (2 Jan 2020). "Death to Unmarried-Family Zoning…and New Life to the Missing Heart". Journal of the American Planning Clan. 86 (1): 113–119. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1651217. ISSN 0194-4363.
  67. ^ "MRSC - Affordable Housing". mrsc.org . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  68. ^ "Missing Middle Housing Initiatives across the US". Missing Middle Arlington . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  69. ^ Litman, Todd (5 June 2020). "Parking Requirement Impacts on Housing Affordability" (PDF). Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
  70. ^ "Regional Housing Task Force". housingtaskforce.mapc.org . Retrieved thirteen March 2021.
  71. ^ "People Over Parking". American Planning Association . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  72. ^ "Reduced parking requirements". Local Housing Solutions . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  73. ^ "Reducing parking ways increasing affordability in eTOD". etod.cnt.org . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  74. ^ "STALLED OUT: How Empty Parking Spaces Diminish Neighborhood Affordability" (PDF). Center for Neighborhood Technology.
  75. ^ "A Map of Cities That Got Rid of Parking Minimums". Potent Towns . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  76. ^ "Evaluating Affordable Housing Development Strategies". Planetizen - Urban Planning News, Jobs, and Pedagogy . Retrieved thirteen March 2021.
  77. ^ "Housing Innovations Program". Puget Audio Regional Quango . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  78. ^ "The Housing Affordability Toolkit". housingtoolkit.nmhc.org . Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  79. ^ "Housing Innovations Program (HIP) Complete Housing Toolkit" (PDF). Puget Sound Regional Quango Housing Innovations Program.
  80. ^ Calisle, Corey (1 August 2017). "NOAH: The New Housing Acronym You lot Need to Learn". ABA Banking Periodical . Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  81. ^ a b "National Association of Housing Cooperatives (NAHC) » Ownership into a Housing Cooperative". Retrieved nineteen July 2021.
  82. ^ "What Is a Co-Op? The Benefits and Drawbacks to Cooperative Housing". Real Estate News & Insights | realtor.com®. 23 March 2015. Retrieved 19 July 2021.
  83. ^ "Leasing Land for Affordable Housing". LILP . Retrieved 19 July 2021.
  84. ^ a b "Community Land Trusts (CLTs)". Community-Wealth.org. 21 June 2012. Retrieved nineteen July 2021.
  85. ^ "Customs state trusts". Local Housing Solutions . Retrieved nineteen July 2021.
  86. ^ "StackPath". groundedsolutions.org . Retrieved 19 July 2021.
  87. ^ "A Tale of Two Town Houses", Atlantic Monthly, November 2007
  88. ^ Badger, Emily (18 July 2013). "Is It Time to Bring Back the Boarding House?". CityLab – The Atlantic Monthly Grouping. Archived from the original on 14 November 2017. Retrieved thirteen November 2017. Politically, information technology's a coalition of the greedy and the well-meaning that led to the banning of private-sector affordable housing in our cities," he says. The well-significant folks were appalled by the living conditions of poor and working-class families. The greedy folks were appalled by the prospect of living next to them. Together, this bad-mannered brotherhood helped advocate laws that established minimum living conditions not merely for safety just also to define how much space an individual should reasonably be expected to live in.
  89. ^ Hansen, Louis (half dozen April 2021). "Fewer parking spaces for new homes, shops? It could happen - Pro-housing groups push reform to mandatory parking minimums". San Jose Mercury News. Researchers at UC Berkeley's Terner Heart for Housing Innovation constitute parking requirements can add up to $36,000 to the price of a single affordable housing unit — more than the cost of using environmentally-friendly materials or paying metropolis development fees. In San Francisco and Los Angeles, parking requirements tin can add upwardly to $75,000 per unit.
  90. ^ Wagner, David (17 October 2018). "LA Metropolis Council Members Just Lost A Way To Block Affordable Housing In Their Districts". LAist. Archived from the original on 3 November 2018.
  91. ^ The Times Editorial Lath (1 August 2018). "Editorial: 50.A. Urban center Council members don't deserve unilateral veto power over homeless projects they don't similar". Los Angeles Times.
  92. ^ "Types of Housing Subsidies". Tenants Union . Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  93. ^ "A blueprint for addressing the global affordable housing claiming" (PDF). McKinsey Global Establish. Oct 2014.
  94. ^ "Solutions to an Unjust Housing System". Shelterforce. 30 July 2018. Retrieved nineteen July 2021.
  95. ^ "Latin America's Co-ops Are an Alternative to Housing Crunch". tribunemag.co.united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland . Retrieved 19 July 2021.
  96. ^ "Due south-South Cooperation: international transfer of the FUCVAM model of mutual aid housing cooperatives". World Habitat . Retrieved 19 July 2021.
  97. ^ Ibán Díaz Parra, Pablo Rabasco Pozuelo (27 November 2013). "¿Revitalización sin gentrificación? Cooperativas de vivienda por ayuda mutua en los centros de Buenos Aires y Montevideo". Cuadernos Geográficos. 52 (2): 99–118.
  98. ^ ""Just what about Singapore?" Lessons from the best public housing program in the world". blogs.worldbank.org . Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  99. ^ "Public Housing | HUD.gov / U.Southward. Department of Housing and Urban Evolution (HUD)". www.hud.gov . Retrieved 31 March 2021.
  100. ^ a b Merrifield, Will; attorney. "How European-Style Public Housing Could Help Solve The Affordability Crisis". NPR.org . Retrieved four April 2021.
  101. ^ a b Holeywell, Ryan (February 2015). "Governing: The International Issue: Haus Cute" (PDF). Governing.
  102. ^ "Welcome to KOREA LAND & HOUSING CORPORATION". world wide web.lh.or.kr . Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  103. ^ Herald, Korea (four June 2013). "LH strives to expand supply of affordable housing". The Korea Herald . Retrieved 25 July 2021.

External links [edit]

  • "The Ethics of Housing and NIMBYism" by Debra Stein

batesmuce1976.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordable_housing

0 Response to "Impact of Affordable Housing on Families and Communities"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel